https://www.selleckchem.com/products/AC-220.html
that of LASr alone (0.83 vs. 0.75), better than all conventional LV diastolic parameters. Inter-technique agreement analysis showed that LASr/E/E'septal had good agreement with the invasive LVEDP measurement, better than the 2016 guideline (kappa = 0.63 vs. 0.25). CONCLUSIONS LASr provided additive diagnostic value for the noninvasive assessment of LV filling pressures. LASr/E/E'septal had the potential to be a better single noninvasive index to predict elevated LV filling pressures in patients with stable CAD and preserved LVEF.BACKGROU
Like
Comment
Share
